![metacritic alea jacta est metacritic alea jacta est](https://static.fore.4pcdn.de/premium/Spiele/14/6c/32817-teaser1.jpg)
- #Metacritic alea jacta est how to#
- #Metacritic alea jacta est manual#
- #Metacritic alea jacta est code#
And yes, I believe it's bad, and it's why good expansion - at least I'm started to know traits for my mine vassals, not just opinion - at least expansion to right direction, had bad, bad reviews.Ĭlick to expand.So it's "I can't understand rules how council take a vote so it's irrational"? No, their personality, opinion, relationships and traits are materlal.
#Metacritic alea jacta est code#
It can be datamined from script and event folders (and it's nice to write bugs if code don't works as intended - code is commented, so we can guess). They didn't tell - "hey, guys, that times when everything that matters was opinion is gone, now traits are in play too!" and they didn't tell how exactly traits are matter. So yeah, the main mistake Paradox made with Conclave is that they changed rules working here for 4 years and don't explain it brightly.
#Metacritic alea jacta est manual#
I also believe it should be more complex, but really, it's not easy to catch how PRIMITIVE system works without manual or explanations. Really, if you're speaking about "hey, I can't understand how this system works", I'm up for you, I always say, here and everywhere where I speak about Conclave - Developers should explain how this system works. Theoretically it should be loyalist, but in practice there are complications with power.īut how a system that takes traits and power, not just one number, have a problem it isn't take traits? The one and only complications happens with priority having two or more equal values.
![metacritic alea jacta est metacritic alea jacta est](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41jtYroD%2BwL._SY291_BO1,204,203,200_QL40_ML2_.jpg)
Also he can be a zealot, if he is Zealous and there is not active crusade where you are not patricipiating (he need just humble or crusader without content or liege having 200 piety). He should have Brave, Honest AND Proud without Craven, Shy, Humble, Content to became Glory Hunter. He should have Cynical, Craven, Just AND (not or) Paranoid without Content, Arbitrary, Slothful, Greedy, Zealous to became Pragmatic with such loyalist traits. If you're trying to say such character CAN be not a loyalist - yeah, he can. A blood brother best friend +100 opinion will vote for the king until he isn't highly into Glory Hunter, Zealot or Pragmatic agenda. I'll concede that everyone has their tastes and preferences - I've yet to grab Sunset Invasion, and my Horse Lords just kinda sits there without Nomads ever being played - but what am I missing, or why am I not enjoying this less?Ĭlick to expand.But he did. My map-painting certainly hasn't been limited, shattered retreat simply gets routed armies out of my hair for a few months, and all defensive pacts do is make me either spread my marriages out or war big.
#Metacritic alea jacta est how to#
I'd seriously never consider myself anywhere near the ranks of truly pro CK2 players, but figuring out Conclave's features and my limitations/challenges and how to face them weren't unintuitive at all, and the game has become neither more difficult nor more frustrating for it. Then I tried it again as somewhere a little more reasonable, took a few punches, and learned the ropes. As a tiny Jewish duke of Semien surrounded by aggressive religious enemies and no clue how to deal with the new council. For all intents and purposes, I was in the malcontent side.
![metacritic alea jacta est metacritic alea jacta est](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/oUu-FzRFYZA/maxresdefault.jpg)
Steam reviews and conventional wisdom said it was a horrible waste, and I heard nothing but of how broken the mechanics were and how much the game was ruined for it. I'll be honest, I was on the fence for a long time about conclave.